How Boredom Boosts Creativity (The Science)
Boredom and creativity have a counterintuitive relationship: boredom may be one of the more reliable ways to prime your brain for creative thinking. The research showing this is specific enough to be useful — it identifies which types of boredom help, which don't, what actually happens in the brain, and what kills the effect.
The short version is that boredom activates the default mode network, a set of brain regions that generate spontaneous associations between remote concepts. Those associations are the raw material that creative thinking runs on. But the mechanism is worth understanding if you want to use this deliberately rather than hoping for it accidentally.
What the Research Found
Sandi Mann and Rebekah Cadman at the University of Central Lancashire ran a study in 2014 testing whether boring tasks made people more creative afterward. Participants in the boredom condition copied names and numbers from a phone book for 15 minutes — deliberately dull work with no intellectual demand. They then completed a standard divergent thinking test: how many uses can you think of for two plastic cups?
The bored participants significantly outperformed a control group that went directly to the creative task. In a follow-up condition, Mann and Cadman added a passive boredom activity: participants read the phone book rather than copying it. Reading was more boring than copying, and those participants performed even better on the divergent thinking test.
The implication is that the more thoroughly you remove cognitive demand without removing structure entirely — the more the mind has to find its own direction — the more creative output follows. The boring task doesn't produce the creativity; it produces the mental state that produces the creativity.
The Default Mode Network
The default mode network (DMN) is a set of interconnected brain regions — primarily the medial prefrontal cortex, the posterior cingulate cortex, the inferior parietal lobule, and the hippocampus — that activate during rest, mind-wandering, and self-referential thought. Marcus Raichle at Washington University identified and named it in 2001, noting that these regions were more active during rest than during task performance.
For a long time, the DMN was interpreted as the "doing nothing" network. That interpretation turned out to be wrong. The DMN is doing something specific: it's integrating emotionally significant memories, running simulations about possible futures, generating self-referential narratives, and — critically for creativity — forming loose associative connections between concepts that aren't directly linked.
Roger Beaty and colleagues at Penn State published research in 2018 showing that highly creative individuals show stronger functional connectivity between the DMN and two other networks: the executive control network (which manages goal-directed attention) and the salience network (which flags what's worth attending to). Creative thinking requires the DMN's associative breadth and the executive network's selective focus — what distinguishes highly creative people is the ability to alternate rapidly between them.
The significance for boredom: a low-demand task releases executive control (you're not using it for anything demanding) while keeping you just alert enough that the DMN runs productively rather than collapsing into sleep or apathetic rumination.
Mind Wandering vs. Daydreaming vs. Boredom
These states are related but distinct.
Mind wandering is thoughts unrelated to the current task arising spontaneously. In Matthew Killingsworth and Daniel Gilbert's 2010 Harvard study using experience-sampling on 2,250 participants, people reported mind-wandering 47% of the time across all activities. Mind wandering during low-demand tasks tends to be loosely future-directed and exploratory — the content is often constructive rather than circular.
Daydreaming is the more deliberately maintained variant: you actively sustain a mental scenario rather than letting thoughts drift passively. The creativity benefits appear to depend substantially on the content of the daydream and how constructively directed it is.
Boredom is the aversive state produced when you have insufficient stimulation but also no compelling mental content to pursue. The aversive quality is part of what makes it useful: boredom motivates a search for stimulation, and when no external stimulation is available, that motivational force turns inward. Andreas Elpidorou at the University of Louisville has argued that boredom functions as a regulatory signal — it flags that the current state is inadequate and drives you toward something better. In creative work, that "something better" is sometimes an unexplored internal association.
Thomas Goetz at the University of Konstanz identified five varieties of boredom: indifferent boredom (calm, slightly positive), calibrating boredom (mild uncertainty about what to do), searching boredom (active restlessness), reactant boredom (frustration and escape-seeking), and apathetic boredom (helplessness). Mann's research and subsequent studies suggest the first two varieties are most beneficial for creativity. Reactant and apathetic boredom are not — the dysregulation and helplessness disrupt the DMN's exploratory processing rather than activating it.
How Boredom Connects to Incubation
The boredom-creativity effect overlaps with the incubation effect — the well-documented phenomenon where stepping away from a problem produces insights that sustained effort doesn't.
The shared mechanism appears to be the default mode network. Incubation works in part because the DMN continues processing the problem during low-demand activity, forming associations between stored problem elements and incoming stimuli. Boredom, by reducing cognitive demand without introducing absorbing new content, creates conditions similar to incubation. The difference is that incubation typically follows intensive work on a specific problem, while boredom research shows that the benefit can arise even without extensive prior problem loading — though loading a problem before the boring period likely improves the quality of the associations that surface.
This overlap points to a practical principle: the creative process benefits from deliberate alternation between high-demand focused effort and low-demand diffuse states. Forcing continuous concentrated effort throughout the day doesn't optimize creative output — it suppresses the associative processing that produces novel connections.
The Smartphone Problem
Smartphones have largely eliminated natural boredom from daily life. Waiting in line, riding public transit, sitting in a meeting, lying in bed — the interstitial moments that previously allowed the mind to wander are now filled with social media, podcasts, and messaging. Most people haven't been genuinely bored in years.
The cognitive cost is difficult to quantify directly for creativity, but research by Thornton, Fenn, and Delaney (2014) found that merely having a smartphone visible on a desk reduces working memory capacity — and that the reduction scales with how strongly participants felt the urge to check it. The phone preloads attention even when unused, preventing the unfocused state where DMN processing runs.
Mary Helen Immordino-Yang at USC has argued that the default mode network plays a role not just in creativity but in building a coherent sense of self, processing emotional experiences, and developing the kind of reflective understanding that underlies complex judgment. Continuous external stimulation may narrow not just creative output but the range of inner life available to draw from when you do sit down to create.
How to Use Boredom Productively
Deliberate boring pre-work. Before a creative task, spend 10–15 minutes on a low-demand monotonous task: copying a list by hand, sorting objects, walking without headphones. The goal is enough structure to prevent you from reaching for your phone, but not enough cognitive demand to suppress DMN activity.
Defend the interstitial moments. Commutes, waiting rooms, and the first minutes after waking are natural incubation environments. Leaving them free — no phone, no podcast — allows the DMN to run the associative processing that connects distant concepts. You don't need to sit and stare; you need to let attention drift rather than directing it.
Distinguish productive from unproductive boredom. Searching and indifferent boredom appear to drive creative benefit. If boredom slides into frustration or helplessness, the state is no longer productive. The useful state is restless but relatively calm — motivated toward internal exploration rather than motivated toward escape.
Pair with problem loading. Like incubation, productive boredom benefits from having something to process. Spending 45 minutes actively engaging a creative problem — writing down constraints, half-solutions, and observations — before a low-demand period gives the DMN concrete material to work with. The associations that surface are more targeted than when you enter the diffuse state cold.
Track the timing. Pay attention to when your creative insights tend to arrive — in the morning, mid-walk, in the shower. This pattern is individual and worth knowing. Schedule low-demand time near your natural insight windows rather than treating those moments as wasted.
The underlying principle is that divergent thinking isn't purely a product of deliberate effort. Some of the most useful associative work happens when you're not actively trying — when attention is diffuse, executive control is low, and the mind is doing what it does naturally when given space. If you want to measure how your divergent thinking changes when you build deliberate low-demand time into your creative routine, the divergent thinking exercise provides a structured before-and-after baseline. Protecting the unfocused time is itself a creative discipline.
Ready to train your creativity? Try science-backed exercises that measure and improve your creative thinking. Start a Free Exercise