← Back to blog
creative thinking examplescreative thinkingcreativitycreative problem solving

12 Creative Thinking Examples from Science and Business

Creativity Drills··9 min read

Creative thinking examples are more useful than definitions. Everyone knows that creative thinking involves generating original ideas. What's harder to understand is the actual cognitive move that makes creative thinking work — the specific shift in approach that turns a blocked problem into a solved one.

These 12 creative thinking examples each illustrate a named technique. After each, I'll connect it to the cognitive science and give you a version you can apply directly.

What Makes an Example of Creative Thinking

A genuine creative thinking example shows the cognitive process, not just the creative output. The end result — a discovery, a product, a piece of art — is interesting. But the example is only useful if it shows what the person did differently in how they thought.

Creative thinking operates through several distinct mechanisms: reframing problems, challenging embedded assumptions, drawing cross-domain analogies, using constraint productively, and generating multiple possibilities before evaluating any of them. The 12 examples below are organized around these mechanisms.

Creative Thinking Examples from Science

1. Einstein's thought experiments (mental simulation). Einstein's most productive thinking tool was the Gedankenexperiment — imagining a scenario that couldn't be set up physically and reasoning through its consequences directly. To probe special relativity, he imagined riding alongside a beam of light and asked what he would observe. The creative move was changing representational medium: by converting an abstract physics problem into a first-person spatial scenario, he made it tractable through spatial-temporal reasoning rather than pure mathematics. Physical intuition became the computational tool.

The lesson: when symbolic reasoning is stuck, try representing the same problem in a different format — diagram, narrative, spatial model, or physical analogy.

2. Watson and Crick's molecular models (changing representation). James Watson and Francis Crick solved the structure of DNA partly by building physical wire-and-cardboard models. This wasn't decoration. Physical models impose hard constraints: atoms can't overlap, bond angles have to be geometrically achievable, the model has to hold together under its own weight. These constraints ruled out wrong answers faster than pure mathematical analysis could.

The representational shift did the cognitive work. By making the structure physical, they outsourced constraint-checking to the physical world rather than carrying it in working memory. The double helix structure they arrived at fit the physical constraints in ways their competitors' mathematical models could not accommodate.

3. Semmelweis and handwashing (assumption archaeology). In 1840s Vienna, physician Ignaz Semmelweis noticed that maternal mortality rates in obstetric wards staffed by medical students were significantly higher than in midwife-staffed wards. Both groups delivered babies. The difference was that medical students came directly from performing autopsies.

The creative move was identifying an assumption so embedded it was invisible: that physicians were inherently benign agents for patients. The conventional medical frame made it impossible to consider that trained doctors could be the cause of illness rather than its remedy. Semmelweis challenged that assumption and introduced mandatory handwashing with chlorinated lime solution, which dropped mortality dramatically.

The medical establishment rejected him, in part because accepting his hypothesis required accepting a disturbing implication about their own role in patient deaths. Assumption archaeology requires being willing to reach conclusions you'd prefer not to reach.

4. Kepler abandons circular orbits (overriding aesthetic assumptions). The assumption that planetary orbits must be circular was embedded in astronomy since Plato — circles were "perfect" geometric forms, appropriate for celestial bodies. Kepler had Tycho Brahe's extremely precise observational data for Mars's position, and circular orbits didn't fit it no matter what he tried.

The creative move was abandoning the Platonic constraint and considering ellipses — "imperfect" conic sections that had no theoretical justification in the existing framework, only the empirical evidence. Kepler's three laws of planetary motion, which Newton later built classical mechanics on, required overriding a metaphysical aesthetic assumption that the data should have contradicted centuries earlier.

Creative Thinking Examples from Business

5. The elevator lobby mirror (problem reframing). When tenants in a Manhattan office building complained about slow elevators, engineers initially framed the problem as "make the elevators faster." An expensive proposal. A building manager suggested an alternative framing: the problem wasn't slow elevators but perceived wait time. The solution was installing floor-to-ceiling mirrors in the lobby. Tenants spent the wait observing themselves and others; complaints dropped to near zero. No engineering work on the elevator system was required.

This is the most applicable creative thinking example on this list. Before investing in a solution, ask whether you've correctly identified the problem. Often the stated problem is a symptom; the actual problem is something adjacent.

6. Netflix's streaming pivot (reframing the business constraint). In 2007, Netflix's DVD-by-mail business was profitable and the dominant service in its category. The dominant assumption in the entertainment industry was that physical distribution was a necessary constraint — someone had to move media from warehouse to consumer. Reed Hastings's creative move was questioning whether Netflix was in the distribution business or the entertainment business. That reframe made streaming a natural extension of the core service rather than a departure into unknown territory.

Blockbuster was in the distribution business. Netflix turned out to be in the entertainment business. The reframe preceded the strategy, not the other way around.

7. Dyson's 5,127 prototypes (iteration as divergent exploration). Most popular accounts of creativity emphasize the flash of insight. James Dyson's development of the dual-cyclone vacuum cleaner took five years and 5,127 prototypes. Each prototype was a hypothesis about where the design could improve. The creative insight was the original idea: that vacuum bags clog and degrade performance, and that industrial cyclone separation could be adapted to domestic scale. But the execution was systematic divergent exploration of the solution space through physical iteration — generating possibilities fast enough that the good ones emerged.

Research by Smith, Ward, and Finke on the "Geneplore" model of creative cognition shows that generation and exploration (divergent phases) and evaluation and refinement (convergent phases) alternate in effective creative work. Dyson's process was an extended alternation, not a single flash.

8. Airbnb's cereal election boxes (constraint-based creativity). In 2008, Airbnb was nearly out of money. They couldn't qualify for conventional funding because they had almost no revenue. The founders Brian Chesky and Joe Gebbia decided to print custom cereal boxes — "Obama O's" and "Cap'n McCains" — tied to the presidential election and sold them as collector's items. The cereal boxes raised $30,000 and kept the company alive long enough to prove its model.

Researcher Catrinel Haught-Tromp has documented the "green constraint" effect: artificial constraints that force departure from habitual solutions reliably increase creative output quality. Extreme resource constraint is the most powerful version. Chesky and Gebbia's cereal solution was only accessible after conventional funding approaches were ruled out. The constraint forced a different problem frame.

Creative Thinking Examples from Design and Art

9. Vignelli's NYC subway map (productive abstraction). Massimo Vignelli's 1972 New York City subway map is one of the most studied graphic design objects in history. It was also controversial: geographic accuracy was low — distances were distorted, diagonal lines were bent to 45- or 90-degree angles, and the park sizes bore no relation to reality.

Vignelli's creative move was identifying which accuracy mattered for the use case. Subway riders need topological accuracy: they need to know the sequence of stops, transfer points, and which train to take. They don't need geographic accuracy. By deliberately discarding one type of accuracy to maximize another, Vignelli produced a map that was wrong about geography and right about everything passengers needed.

The productive abstraction technique — identifying which features of a problem matter and deliberately stripping the rest — is as applicable in software design, strategy, and science as it is in graphic design.

10. Gutenberg's press (cross-domain structural analogy). Johannes Gutenberg's contribution wasn't any single invention. Wine and olive presses existed. Individual metal stamps existed. The concept of reproducing text mechanically existed in Asian printing. Gutenberg's creative move was recognizing that an agricultural pressing mechanism and a metalworking stamping process solved the same underlying mechanical problem when recombined — applying even pressure across a flat surface to transfer a pattern.

Structural analogy — recognizing that two superficially different domains share the same functional structure — is one of the most powerful creative thinking techniques. The analogical encoding exercise trains exactly this: learning to see past surface features to structural equivalences across domains.

Creative Thinking Techniques the Examples Demonstrate

11. Random forced connection. The Gutenberg example above is a formalized version of a technique you can use deliberately. Take any object or concept from a completely different domain and ask: "What properties does this have that might apply to my problem?" The random element bypasses your current habitual frame because the random concept has no existing connection to your problem. Your mind will generate connections anyway — that's what it does — and some of those connections will be non-obvious and useful.

The divergent thinking examples post covers this in more detail, including how to score and track your performance on this technique over time.

12. Reframing through constraint removal. Identify one assumption your current approach requires that you've never explicitly questioned. Ask: what would we do if this assumption weren't true? What if the elevator didn't need to be faster? What if we didn't need funding? What if orbits don't need to be circular?

This is assumption archaeology — the technique Semmelweis and Kepler both used, in different forms. Most cognitive fixation on a problem comes from an embedded assumption that isn't visible as an assumption. Naming it and interrogating it is often the fastest route to a reframe.

The Pattern Across All 12 Examples

Every creative thinking example above involves the same underlying cognitive move: departing from the default frame long enough to generate a non-obvious alternative, then evaluating it on its merits rather than dismissing it because it departs from convention.

The creative process research describes this as the divergent phase — the period of generative exploration before evaluation begins. Every one of the 12 examples shows a person or team staying in that generative phase longer than convention would have required, and finding something that strict convergence on the obvious answer would have prevented.


Ready to train your creativity? Try science-backed exercises that measure and improve your creative thinking. Start a Free Exercise