Daydreaming and Creativity: What Science Shows

For most of the twentieth century, daydreaming was treated as a failure of attention — a distraction from the task at hand, a symptom of boredom or poor discipline. Then in 2001, Marcus Raichle and colleagues at Washington University published a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences identifying a network of brain regions that activate consistently when the mind is not focused on an external task. They called it the Default Mode Network. And it turned out to be anything but idle.

The connection between daydreaming and creativity has since accumulated substantial experimental support. The Default Mode Network is now understood to be active during episodic memory retrieval, future projection, social cognition, narrative processing, and — most relevant here — the spontaneous recombination of stored knowledge in ways that produce novel associations. The network that activates when you stare out the window is the same network that generates creative insight.

What the Default Mode Network Does

The DMN is a large-scale brain network whose core nodes include the medial prefrontal cortex, the posterior cingulate cortex, and the angular gyrus. These regions communicate at high levels during unstructured thought — mind-wandering, future planning, imagining other perspectives, narrative reasoning.

What the DMN is doing during this activity is not well-described as "resting." Raichle's group initially used "default mode" to mean the brain's activity in the absence of a defined task — the baseline state. But subsequent research showed that this baseline is far from passive. The network is running continuous simulations: projecting forward in time, replaying past events with variations, constructing models of other people's mental states, and traversing semantic memory in ways that don't follow the logical constraints of deliberate search.

That last point matters for creativity. Deliberate problem-solving tends to follow familiar paths through semantic memory — you search for the kind of answer that has worked before, in the kind of category where the problem seems to belong. The DMN wanders more freely. It activates associations that deliberate search would screen out as irrelevant. Some of those screened-out associations are the ones that lead to insight.

Baird et al.: The Distraction Study

The clearest experimental evidence for daydreaming's creative value comes from a 2012 study by Benjamin Baird and colleagues at the University of California, Santa Barbara, published in Psychological Science.

The study design was elegant. Participants completed an Unusual Uses Task (measuring divergent thinking) on two objects — listing as many uses as possible for each. They were then given a 12-minute break. One group did a demanding cognitive task during the break. A second group did an undemanding task — specifically designed to produce mind-wandering. A third group rested without any task. A fourth group skipped the break entirely and went straight to the next task.

Afterward, all participants completed Unusual Uses Tasks for the same objects from the first session, plus two new objects.

The result: participants in the undemanding (mind-wandering) condition significantly outperformed all other groups on the repeat objects — the ones they'd already worked on. They didn't outperform on the new objects. The effect was specific to problems that had already been loaded into memory and then incubated during mind-wandering. The undemanding task produced more creative solutions than rest, a demanding task, or no break at all.

This is a clean operationalization of what Graham Wallas described in 1926 as the "incubation" stage of creativity — the period between conscious effort and insight when unconscious processing continues. The incubation effect is real, and it requires the right mental conditions. Not all breaks are equal: the wandering mind outperforms both the resting mind and the occupied one.

Mind-Wandering Is Not the Same as Spacing Out

Jonathan Schooler at UCSB, who has studied mind-wandering for two decades, distinguishes between two types. Intentional mind-wandering — deliberately allowing thought to drift — tends to be more productive for creative work. Unintentional mind-wandering — losing track of what you were supposed to be doing — is associated with lower performance and more variable outcomes.

The distinction matters practically. Deliberate daydreaming is not the same as distraction. When you set aside twenty minutes, load a problem into memory, and allow your mind to wander with that problem as context, you are running the incubation protocol. When attention simply drifts during a task you're supposed to be completing, you're losing both the task and the incubation.

A 2013 study by Paul Seli and colleagues found that people who reported more intentional mind-wandering scored higher on measures of creativity. The relationship was specific to intentional wandering; unintentional wandering did not show the same association. Learning to wander with purpose — to release deliberate search while keeping the problem available in memory — is the trainable skill.

The Problem of the Unloaded Mind

There's a limiting condition that researchers consistently identify: daydreaming produces creative benefits only when the relevant problem has been loaded into memory through prior effort. You cannot incubate a problem you haven't thought about.

This is why experienced creative professionals often describe their best ideas as arriving in the shower, on a walk, or during a commute — not during the blank page, but after extended failed effort at the blank page. The effort loads the problem. The daydream processes it.

Walking and creativity research bears this out: the Stanford studies by Oppezzo and Schwartz found that walking boosted divergent thinking most when participants had been working on a problem before the walk. The boost came from movement plus prior problem-loading, not movement alone.

The same pattern appears in sleep and creativity research: REM sleep produces the strongest creative consolidation effects when the relevant material was studied before sleep. The consolidation requires something to consolidate.

Load the problem deliberately. Then stop trying.

Why Screens Interrupt the Process

The DMN activates during unstructured attention. Screens structure attention continuously. This is one of the more underappreciated costs of constant device availability: the periods that historically produced daydreaming — waiting in line, commuting, eating alone — now involve scrolling through external content that captures attention and keeps the DMN suppressed.

Research on smartphone use and boredom by Erin Westgate and Timothy Wilson found that people consistently chose mild electric shocks over sitting quietly with their thoughts — the discomfort of unstructured mental time is apparently high enough that people will accept pain to avoid it. But that discomfort is where the creative processing happens.

Protecting unstructured mental time isn't nostalgia. It's preserving the conditions under which the DMN does its associative work. Deliberately leaving the phone behind during walks, letting attention wander during low-demand tasks, and tolerating the discomfort of an unfilled pause are inputs to the creative process, not escapes from it.

Practical Protocol for Creative Daydreaming

Load the problem first. Work deliberately on the problem until you hit resistance — not for five minutes, but long enough to activate the relevant concepts in memory. The incubation effect requires prior engagement. Without it, daydreaming is just daydreaming.

Choose a low-demand activity. The Baird et al. study used an undemanding vigilance task. More practical equivalents: walking a familiar route, doing dishes, folding laundry, showering. The task should require just enough attention to prevent you from trying to deliberately solve the problem, but not so much that it suppresses DMN activity.

Protect the transition. The moments after a low-demand activity — when the mind comes back to the problem — are when insight tends to surface. Don't immediately fill them with input. Keep something nearby to capture what arrives.

Schedule it like work. Most productive creative processes include structured ideation (deliberate search) and incubation (daydreaming). Treating daydreaming as wasted time means cutting it out under schedule pressure — exactly when it's most needed. Scheduling a 20-minute walk after a stuck brainstorming session is not procrastination.

Use divergent thinking exercises to load the problem. Structured exercises that push you to generate large numbers of ideas — even weak ones — activate a broad set of semantic associations before incubation. The wider the semantic field loaded during effort, the more connections are available for the DMN to traverse.

The Catch

Daydreaming helps creative incubation. It does not replace preparation, skill, or judgment. The Default Mode Network can only recombine what's already in memory. It cannot source novel knowledge, develop technical skill, or evaluate whether an insight is actually good.

The productive daydreamers are, almost without exception, people who have spent extensive time in deliberate preparation — loading their memory with relevant knowledge, working problems until they hit limits, developing the expertise needed to recognize when a recombination is interesting. Albert Einstein reportedly arrived at the thought experiment that led to special relativity while daydreaming on a tram. What made the daydream productive was ten years of intense preparation in physics that preceded it.

The research doesn't suggest relaxing more. It suggests alternating more deliberately between focused effort and unstructured recovery — and protecting both phases from interference. The wandering mind produces better ideas when it has something worth wandering around in.

Ready to train your creativity? Try science-backed exercises that measure and improve your creative thinking. Start a Free Exercise