Openness to Experience and Creativity: The Research
Of the five major personality traits identified by the Big Five model — openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism — openness to experience has the strongest and most consistent relationship with creativity.
This isn't a modest correlation. A meta-analysis by Feist (1998) covering 83 studies found openness to experience was the personality trait most robustly associated with creative achievement across artistic and scientific domains. A comprehensive review by Puryear, Kettler, and Rinn (2017) confirmed the finding, with effect sizes ranging from r = 0.37 to r = 0.54 across different creativity measures. That range puts openness to experience in the territory of strong predictors, not mere correlates.
Understanding what openness is — and how it relates to specific creative capacities — is useful for anyone working to develop their creative thinking.
What Openness to Experience Actually Describes
Openness to experience is not general curiosity. It's a cluster of six related but distinct tendencies, each of which contributes to the creativity relationship differently.
Intellectual curiosity: A drive to explore ideas, tolerate ambiguity, and pursue complexity. High-openness individuals tend to read across domains, pursue questions without clear answers, and enjoy intellectual material for its own sake.
Aesthetic sensitivity: Strong responsiveness to beauty, craft, and form — in music, visual art, literature, and mathematics. High-openness individuals tend to have intense aesthetic reactions and engage deeply with cultural objects.
Fantasy and imagination: A tendency to create rich internal experiences — vivid daydreaming, elaborate hypothetical reasoning, detailed imagined scenarios. This isn't escapism; it's active use of generative cognitive capacity.
Openness to feelings: Awareness and acceptance of one's own emotional states, including complex and contradictory ones. High-openness individuals tend to be emotionally articulate and introspective.
Openness to actions: Willingness to try new experiences, change routines, and seek novelty in daily life rather than preferring established patterns.
Openness to ideas: Comfort with intellectual complexity, nuance, and apparent contradiction. High-openness individuals tend to hold multiple perspectives simultaneously without needing to resolve them.
These facets cluster together because they share an underlying tendency: broad associative sampling. High-openness individuals process a wider range of inputs, make fewer automatic categorical judgments, and hold conceptual boundaries more loosely. This is the mechanism through which openness drives creative output.
The Cognitive Mechanisms
The link between openness and creativity reflects specific, identifiable cognitive processes.
Research by DeYoung, Quilty, and Peterson connects openness to experience to dopaminergic function in the mesolimbic system, particularly reward circuits associated with novelty-seeking and exploration. High-openness individuals appear to have higher dopaminergic drive, which increases the subjective reward of encountering new information. Novel stimuli feel genuinely interesting rather than mildly relevant.
This connects to what researchers call latent inhibition — the automatic filtering that prevents previously encountered stimuli from reaching conscious attention when they've appeared without consequence. Individuals with lower latent inhibition let more information reach conscious awareness. When combined with high working memory capacity (which allows organizing and integrating that additional information), lower latent inhibition produces broader associative sampling without cognitive disorganization.
The practical result: high-openness individuals form unexpected connections more readily because they're working with a richer pool of simultaneously activated associations. Divergent thinking — generating multiple responses to an open-ended prompt — comes more naturally to high-openness individuals because the semantic search they conduct is wider by default.
This also explains the link between openness and analogical reasoning. Structural analogies between distant domains require perceiving commonality across categories that are superficially dissimilar. High-openness individuals' looser categorical structure makes those cross-domain connections more accessible.
Domain Differences in the Openness-Creativity Relationship
The relationship between openness and creative achievement isn't uniform. Openness predicts artistic creativity most strongly. It predicts scientific creativity significantly, but conscientiousness — which drives systematic follow-through — plays a larger co-equal role in science.
A study by Kaufman and colleagues (2015) differentiated between aesthetic openness (the fantasy, aesthetics, and feelings facets) and intellectual openness (the intellect and ideas facets). Aesthetic openness predicted artistic and literary creativity better than intellectual openness. Intellectual openness predicted scientific and philosophical creativity better.
This matters for development. If you're working on creative output in technical or scientific domains, the intellect facet of openness — comfort with complexity and contradiction, tolerance of unresolved problems — is the most relevant target. If you're working on artistic or expressive creativity, aesthetic sensitivity and imaginative engagement are more directly relevant.
Can Openness Be Developed?
Personality traits are relatively stable across adulthood, but they're not fixed. Longitudinal studies show measurable changes in all Big Five traits. Openness tends to peak in young adulthood and declines modestly with age on average — though the individual variation is large and the age trend is not inevitable.
More importantly for creative development, the specific cognitive habits associated with high openness can be cultivated even when the underlying trait is stable. The trait describes what comes easily; deliberate practice can access the same cognitive modes through effort.
Deliberate exposure to novel domains: Engaging seriously with intellectual and aesthetic traditions distant from your own. The key word is "seriously" — surface familiarity doesn't activate the cross-domain associative connections that openness enables naturally. Reading a book on evolutionary biology as a software engineer, or engaging with abstract painting as a scientist, builds the distributed semantic structure that high-openness individuals develop automatically through their habitual engagement patterns.
Suspending judgment during idea generation: Openness correlates with reduced evaluative reactivity during divergent thinking tasks. This can be practiced structurally. Any exercise that explicitly prohibits judgment during generation — brainstorming, alternate uses tasks, free association — externally imposes the low-evaluation mode that high-openness individuals maintain more naturally.
Seeking far analogies: Deliberately looking for structural parallels between your domain and distant ones exercises the same cross-domain associative search that openness enables automatically. The analogical reasoning exercise makes this explicit: you're given pairs of concepts and asked to identify the structural relationship, then find analogous relationships in entirely different domains.
Aesthetic engagement as practice: Active engagement with art, music, and literature — not consumption, but careful attention and analysis — develops the aesthetic sensitivity facet of openness. Writing a paragraph describing what you notice in a piece of music or a painting activates the same fine-grained perceptual attention that high-openness individuals apply habitually.
Tolerance of unresolved problems: Intellectual openness includes comfort with ambiguity — sitting with a problem before converging on an answer. Deliberately extending the generative phase of problem-solving, resisting the pull toward early closure, trains this capacity directly.
Openness and Cognitive Flexibility
The relationship between openness and cognitive flexibility is close but not identical. Cognitive flexibility refers specifically to the ability to switch between mental frameworks, update beliefs in response to new evidence, and apply different rules to different contexts. Openness to experience is a broader trait that includes cognitive flexibility as one of its downstream effects.
High openness facilitates cognitive flexibility by reducing the rigidity of existing categorical structures. When conceptual boundaries are loose and the range of considered information is wide, shifting perspectives requires less effortful override of entrenched associations. The shift comes more naturally.
For practical development, cognitive flexibility exercises — tasks that require switching between classification schemes, updating probabilistic beliefs, or adopting unfamiliar perspectives — build the specific mental agility that openness enables. This targeted practice is more efficient than trying to change the underlying trait directly.
Ready to train your creativity? Try science-backed exercises that measure and improve your creative thinking. Start a Free Exercise